Community Resilience in 2100 (2)
| Most Resilient |
| |
| |
| |
| Least Resilient |
Sea-level Rise Exposure in 2100 (3)
Storm Surge Exposure to simulated Cat 1 hurricane event in 2006 (4)
Storm Surge Exposure to simulated Cat 1 hurricane event in 2100 (5)
Sea-level Rise Risk in 2100 (6)
| No Risk |
| Lowest Risk |
| Low-Med Risk |
| Medium Risk |
| Med-High Risk |
| Highest Risk |
Storm Surge Risk to simulated Cat 1 hurricane event in 2006 (7)
| No Risk |
| Lowest Risk |
| Low-Med Risk |
| Medium Risk |
| Med-High Risk |
| Highest Risk |
Storm Surge Risk to simulated Cat 1 hurricane event in 2100 (8)
| No Risk |
| Lowest Risk |
| Low-Med Risk |
| Medium Risk |
| Med-High Risk |
| Highest Risk |
Existing Marsh Management in 2006 (11)
| Federal, State and TNC Management Areas |
Conservation Areas in 2006 (12)
| Conservation Management Areas |
Potential Marsh Management Areas in 2100 (13)
| Future Marsh in Management |
Existing Marsh Loss in 2100 (14)
| Marsh Loss |
Future Marsh Advance in 2100 (15)
| Marsh Advance |
Marsh Priority Areas in 2100 (16)
| Priority Conservation Areas |
Marsh Viability by Census Block Group in 2100 (17)
| High viability |
| Med-High viability |
| Medium viability |
| Low-Med viability |
| Low viability |
| New Marsh |
| No Marsh |
Storm Surge Inundation in 2006 (20)
Storm Surge Inundation in 2006 with all salt marsh removed (21)
Storm Surge Inundation in 2050 (23)
Storm Surge Inundation in 2100 (24)
| High : 11.901 |
| |
| Low : 0.328 |
|